FIN.

Category - Consumer Credit

FCA updates on BNPL registrations

The FCA has updated its website resources on the upcoming changes to buy now pay later (deferred payment credit) regulation. The window for unregulated firms currently providing services that will require regulation...

FCA updates on CCR009

The FCA has published resources on the new CCR009 return that replaces the CCR004 and CCR005 and elements of CCR002 and CCR007 for ancillary credit firms. Most firms will need to submit annually, but firms with annual...

FCA sets out roadmap for mortgage rule reforms

The FCA has published a roadmap on modernising mortgage rules. The FCA launched a discussion paper in June 2025 on areas in which changes could be made to the current mortgages framework. It now publishes its feedback...

Domestic supplier BNPL exemption confirmed

HM Treasury has made the legislation confirming that domestic premises suppliers will be exempt from the credit broking activity in relation to deferred payment credit (or BNPL) agreements, when the activity becomes a...

FCA blogs on evolution of consumer credit

Alison Waters, director of consumer finance at the FCA, has looked at what the next decade holds for consumer credit. She noted the 2024 Financial Lives survey which found that 84% of UK adults had at least one credit...

Motor finance commission: Supreme Court allows lender appeals

The Supreme Court has delivered its long-awaited judgment on motor finance commissions, and has allowed lender appeals on 2 of the 3 matters under appeal. It upheld only the CCA unfair relationship claim.�This post has been drafted on the basis of Lord Reed’s speech. We will publish updated and more detailed articles in the light of the published judgment.
Delivering the judgment, Lord Reed described the nature of the relationships involved. He focussed on how the car dealer is dependent on the finance being agreed in order to sell a car. He spoke of various actions the dealer could take if, for instance, the lender would not advance enough credit or the monthly payments would be too much for the customer to pay. The key, he said, is that the dealer has a commercial interest in the negotiations over the finance package, which will continue until the package is entered into.
He moved on to discuss how the consumer does not deal directly with the finance company, although the loan agreement is directly between the consumer and the finance company. The motor dealer will make all the arrangements. It does not act as agent of the customer, is not remunerated by the customer and does not give the customer any reassurance that it is putting its commercial interests aside – and it could not do that! The Supreme Court noted that FCA rules require the dealer to disclose that commission is receivable if it could affect the dealer’s impartiality or have a material impact on the customer’s decision, but that nothing in the regulatory regime requires lender or dealers to disclose the existence or amount of any commission payment or to get the customer’s consent.
The customers seeking to recover from the lenders the commission that had been paid to the brokers all contended that:

the finance companies committed the common law tort of bribery by paying commission to the dealers
the dealers owed the customers a fiduciary duty and as such could not have any personal interest in the conclusion of the transaction and if that is so, acceptance of the commission was a breach of this, and the lenders had dishonestly assisted in the breach by paying the commission

Mr Johnson additionally claimed the relationship was unfair under the CCA.
The Supreme Court, noting that the Court of Appeal’s stance had shocked the lenders and the FCA, stated:

the payment of commission was not a bribe. The car dealers clearly and properly had an interest in the finance being arranged, and clearly wanted to sell the vehicles at a profit, and so clearly owed no duty to the customers. Each of the 3 parties (lender, dealer, customer) was engaged at arm’s length pursuing their own interests, and no-one could think otherwise;
for the same reason, no-one could think the dealer was acting as a fiduciary because it was at all times pursuing its commercial interests. The Supreme Court said that the distinguishing obligation of a fiduciary is often described as a “duty of single-minded loyalty to the person for whom they act”;
the Court of Appeal had failed to understand that the dealer had its own interests and mistakenly thought the dealer was acting in the interests of the customer once the customer had chosen the car. It was also wrong to take the approach that because the customer trusted the dealer and may have been vulnerable this meant that the dealer was acting as fiduciary.

So the Court of Appeal was wrong on the first two issues. On the unfair relationships issue, the Supreme Court said that the fact there may have been no or only partial disclosure of commission did not of itself make a relationship unfair. There are many factors to consider. Here, a major factor was that the commission was 55% of the total charge for credit, and that large figure is a good indication of unfairness.� Additionally here the documentation was misleading in that they did not disclose that the dealer and lender had an agreement that gave the lender first refusal – in fact it gave the impression that the dealer would go to a panel of lenders to get the best price for the loan. The fact that Mr Johnson did not read any of the documents he was given was not a persuasive factor against a decision of unfairness, given that the information in question was well hidden – even though, had Mr Johnson read it, it could have led him to discover the amount of the commission. The Supreme Court said the lender should pay to Mr Johnson the amount of commission plus a commercial rate of interest, and that because what the Court of Appeal had said was full of mistakes, the lender’s appeal had to be allowed so as to substitute an order in Mr Johnson’s favour on different terms to the Court of Appeal’s.
The Supreme Court also explained that it had refused the Treasury’s application to intervene since the Treasury wanted to discuss the economic impact of any decision, which is not within the Court’s interest.
 

FCA announces more firm failures

The FCA has announced that two more firms have failed: Argentex LLP, authorised to provide e-money and payment services and also wealth management, went into special administration under the Payment and EMI Insolvency...

Court looks at “business test” when loans are refinanced

In a repossession case brought by an unregulated lender, Principal Bridging Limited (PBL), the County Court found that where a loan is used to refinance previous borrowing, it is the purpose for which the original loan is taken out which determines whether it is “wholly or predominantly for the purposes of a business” for the purposes of Articles 60C and 60O of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Regulated Activities Order) 2001 (the RAO).
In this case, the borrower, Mr Lewis took out a bridging loan with PBL (secured as a second charge loan against his primary residence) which was used to refinance an earlier loan (with a different lender) which in turn had been use to refinance an original loan (from a third lender). It was taken as a matter of fact that Mr Lewis had used a maximum of 50% of the original for business purposes and, therefore, it had not been used “wholly or predominantly for the purposes of a business” carried on by him (and, therefore, was as a matter of fact a regulated mortgage contract as the exemption under Article 61A(1)(c) of the RAO. However, the Court found that PBL had no way of knowing this and that Mr Lewis had made repeated representations that he would use the loan PBL made for business purposes and, therefore, the loan was unregulated and not a regulated mortgage contract.
In the alternative, the Court also found that if the PBL loan�was a regulated mortgage contract, it would still have been just and equitable for PBL to enforce the loan due to the repeated representations made by Mr Lewis.
Following on from these findings, and taking into account Mr Lewis history of defaulting on previous lending the interest rate charged by PBL was not an unenforceable penalty.
Lastly, it followed that the relationship between PBL and Mr Lewis could not be said to be unfair for the purposes of Sections 140A-C of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

Treasury publishes BNPL legislation

The Government has finally published its response to its consultations on regulation of buy-now-pay-later products and services and laid the necessary legislation before Parliament.
The Government had already decided that the BNPL products that should no longer benefit from the article 60F(2) RAO exemption would be those offered by third-party providers – so that those offered by merchants would continue to benefit so long as the products met the conditions of the article. It subsequently consulted on the draft legislation it had drafted to achieve the changes.
However, in response to the draft consultation, it received many representations that allowing merchants to carry on using the exemption created an unlevel playing field, and particularly expressing concerns that large tech and e-commerce platforms would start offering BNPL agreements on a similar scale to third-party lenders. The Government acknowledges this risk but says it is important that low-risk everyday transactions should continue to be within the exemption.� It will monitor developments and respond it if sees any significant change or potential consumer harm.
The Government also intends to proceed with its proposals:

to disapply the CCA information disclosure requirements to BNPL products, so that the FCA can draft its own bespoke rules;
to retain the possibility for the court to make time orders where appropriate; and
to exempt most merchants from the need to become authorised credit brokers in order to promote BNPL products; and
urgently to put in place a temporary permissions regime for firms needing authorisation.

Once the enabling legislation is made, the FCA will then have 12 months to draft, consult on and finalise its rules, and regulation will start from mid-2026. The FCA will consult soon on its rules and will, in its consultation, set out its timescales.

Government consults on CCA reform

The Government is consulting on how it will take forward reform of the CCA. It has decided to split the reform into 2 phases. The first phase covers information requirements, sanctions and criminal offences. on...

FOS publishes half yearly complaints data

The FOS has published its complaints data for the period July to December 2024. Key statistics include: an increase of nearly 50% in new complaints compared to the same period in 2023 (141,000 new complaints) –...

FCA publishes work programme 2025-6

The FCA has published its work programme for 2025-26, which builds on the 4 priority areas in its 5 year plan. Specific initiatives additional to those set out in the 5 year plan (which we summarised in this article)...

FCA updates on motor finance complaints

FCA has further updated its page containing guidance on the handling of motor finance complaints to include the link to its submission to the Supreme Court. It had previously updated its guidance in the light of the...

High Court backs FOS on DCA complaint

The High Court has dismissed all 3 grounds of appeal brought by a lender under a discretionary commission arrangement (DCA) for motor finance, following a FOS decision to uphold a customer complaint. The grounds of...

FOS warns on lack of understanding of s75

The FOS has said that failing to understand the rules around claims under s75 CCA can affect consumers’ chances of getting their money back. Its guidance debunks several myths: that s75 only helps if the purchase...

FOS publishes half-yearly complaints data

FOS’ latest half-yearly complaints data shows a rise of 20% in complaints during H2 2023, with the rise driven mainly by banking and credit complaints. Within that sector, current accounts and credit cards...

FCA updates on motor finance complaints

Following the announcement of its review into motor finance complaints, the FCA has published a statement on progress made to date. It says that firms have engaged with the FCA constructively but many are struggling to...

FCA updates perimeter report

The FCA has updated its Perimeter Report on its website.  It was last updated in March 2023. Among the issues discussed are: FCA’s general approach to the perimeter; when it will take action against unauthorised...

FCA speech: investing in outcomes

Nikhil Rathi, Chief Executive of the FCA, has delivered a speech on the FCA’s broad approach to topics in which investors have recently been expressing significant interest. The speech highlighted the following as...

FLA launches accreditation service

FLA’s new Broker Accreditation (Asset Finance) Service will help brokers show they are compliant with FLA’s Business Finance Code and their regulatory obligations. It also says the accreditation, which...

FCA proposes credit information changes

FCA has announced proposals which will: require FCA-regulated data contributors, such as lenders, to share credit information with credit reference agencies (CRAs); introduce a common data reporting format to enhance...

Lenders go into administration

FCA has confirmed that Morses Club Limited, a home collected credit lender, and its subsidiary Shelby Finance Limited (Dot Dot Loans – an online HCST lender) have gone into administration. It provided information...

EU adopts new consumer credit directive

The EU has adopted the new Directive on Consumer Credits (CCD), repealing and replacing the 2008 Consumer Credit Directive in order to take account of the significant changes that have taken place in the consumer credit...

HCSTC lender goes into administration

FCA has announced the administration of Novaloans Limited, an online only high-cost short-term lender and provided details of its administrators and the entity the administrators have instructed to collect all...

Supreme Court rules on limitation in PPI case

In the case of Smith and another (Appellants) v Royal Bank of Scotland (Respondent) [2023] UKSC 34, the Supreme Court has ruled that the claims made by claimants seeking orders under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 were...

FCA cancels unused permissions

The FCA has used its power to cancel consumer credit permissions which were not used for 2 years. Mr Roche was authorised by the FCA in January 2015 and held consumer credit permissions of: agreeing to carry on a...

FCA warns consumers on loan fee fraud

FCA has issued a consumer warning to help customers avoid loan fee fraud as they look to cover the costs of summer spending.  This type of fraud, which involves customers paying for a loan they never receive, typically...

FOS warns on credit hire risks

FOS is warning that many consumers do not understand the risks of credit hire, which could leave them facing large bills. Credit hire is used as an alternative to claiming on motor insurance, and involves claims or...

FLA publishes consumer credit research

The Finance and Leasing Association has published a research paper that looks at what improvements consumers would like to see in consumer credit. While many respondents thought the products and markets are functioning...

Treasury consults on BNPL legislation

Treasury has published the long-awaited consultation on draft legislation to bring those who offer Buy-Now-Pay-Later and similar products within the scope of financial regulation.  It has published both the draft law...

FCA extends confirmed guidance on motor ads

FCA has extended its confirmation of the Radiocentre industry guidance on ensuring financial promotions for motors brands on radio are clear, fair and not misleading and compliant with CONC.  The guidance is now...

FCA consults on credit information improvements

FCA has set out its initial findings from a credit information market study in an interim report and discussion paper and its annexes. The study was launched because of concerns about the quality of credit information...

FCA allows Amigo to re-start lending in pilot

FCA has published a letter sent to Amigo Loans which approves its request to start lending again on a pilot basis. In 2020, following a large number of customer complaints, Amigo paused new lending and announced that it...

FCA portfolio letter to high-cost lenders

FCA has published its portfolio supervision letter in relation to high-cost lending products. The letter sets out the risks FCA believes high-cost firms pose to their customers and the markets in which they operate and...

FCA warns again on misleading BNPL ads

FCA has written to BNPL providers and to the British Retail Consortium, warning them that even while some BNPL agreements remain currently unregulated, this does not mean that the financial promotion rules don’t...

Treasury confirms BNPL proposals

Treasury has published its consultation response to its plans for regulating the buy-now-pay-later credit market. It has confirmed that: lenders offering BNPL will need to be authorised by FCA; lenders will need to...

FCA to remove credit broker permissions

FCA has published its first supervisory notice against Semantic Business Services Ltd, a secondary credit broker.  It plans to remove the firm’s permissions because: the firm has links with a number of other firms...

FCA confirms non-opposition to Amigo scheme

FCA has written to Amigo Loans to confirm it will not be attending the hearings to oppose its proposals for its Scheme of Arrangement. FCA has previously said the new proposal is an improvement on the failed proposal of...

CAT determines the ‘domicile date’

CAT has published its Judgment giving further guidance on the ‘domicile date’, which is the date specified in a CPO. The domicile date operates to determine the persons who fall within the class definition...

FCA portfolio letter for Credit Unions

The FCA has published a portfolio letter to Credit Union Boards setting out the usual key risks of harm that are present for Credit Unions, their members and the markets in which they operate. The letter asks firms to...

UK Finance responds on BNPL consultation

UK Finance has published its response to HM Treasury’s consultation on the regulation of BNPL products. The response shows that there is a consensus amongst UK Finance members: that BNPL products should be brought...

Treasury consults on BNPL

Treasury has published the long-awaited consultation on buy-now pay-later regulation, following the announcement on 2 February that the Government would implement the Woolard Review recommendation to bring interest free...