FIN.

Category - Resources

SFO Director retires mid-term

Nick Ephgrave, Director of the SFO, is to retire at the end of March – half way through his 5 year post. The SFO will appoint an interim director before starting a formal recruitment process for his successor. Mr...

Tribunal upholds FCA fine and ban on adviser

The Upper Tribunal has upheld the FCA’s decision to fine and ban a financial adviser. The FCA had decided Darren Reynolds had caused customers significant harm by acting dishonestly and showing a clear disregard...

PRA publishes 2026 supervisory plans

The PRA has published its supervisory priorities for 2026. Its main plans focus on streamlining supervision, so that periodic supervisory meetings and other activities will move to a two year cycle – an initiative...

FCA investigates CMC

The FCA has announced it is investigating the activities of The Claims Protection Agency Limited, a claims management company which has used several trading names, in relation to its advertising and sales tactics for...

FCA publishes AGM question responses

The FCA has published a 60 page document setting out its responses to questions raised but not answered at its AGM. The answers are grouped into topics, including: AI – and in particular how to ensure vulnerable...

PRA finalises “low impact” changes

The PRA has published finalised changes to its rules which it has designated as having low impact. The changes include: conditional disapplication of the General Provisions to give effect to the deference arrangements...

Treasury publishes report on PESAR

HM Treasury has published a report on the Payment and Electronic Money Special Administration Regime introduced under the Payment and Electronic Money Institution Insolvency Regulations 2021. The report, by Adam...

Regulators update Regulatory Initiatives Grid

The latest edition of the Regulatory Initiatives Grid updates on timelines for 124 live initiatives across the 9 organisations covered by the grid. The press release heralding the publication highlights the themes of:...

FCA launches “Firm Checker”

The FCA has launched a new tool called “Firm Checker” so that consumers can check to see whether firms that approach them are properly authorised and have the right permissions for the services they plan to...

Regulators set out 2026 growth measures

The FCA has written to the Prime Minister setting out its growth measures planned for 2026. The ambitious package highlights that the FCA has met nearly all of the 50 commitments it promised to do this year, and that...

FCA consults on rule clarifications

The FCA is consulting on various rule changes to: resolve uncertainties in current rules; make some current rules clearer or more proportionate; and resolve conflicts and duplications. General changes update and remove...

PRA confirms reporting template deletion

The PRA has confirmed it will be deleting 37 templates from its reporting requirements, following its consultation earlier this year. It will also be consolidating the FINREP scoping provisions into one single rulebook...

Regulators report on mutuals

The PRA and FCA have published a report on the mutuals landscape, looking at the importance of mutuals to the financial sector, and the measures the regulators take to ensure proportionality in regulation. The report...

BoE launches private markets exercise

The BoE has started a second system-wide exploratory scenario exercise relating to the private markets. This one focuses on how the ecosystem operates under stress and how this could impact the UK economy and financial...

FPC publishes December update

The records of the FPC meetings on 25 November and 1 December note that: risks to financial stability have increased during 2025 for a variety of reasons, including fragmentation of trade and financial markets; many...

PRA publishes lists of SIIs

The PRA has published updated lists of

UK headquartered globally systemically important institutions; and
buffer rates for other SIIs which are ring-fences banks, large domestic firms and large building societies.

FCA Q2 metrics show all deadlines met

The FCA’s operating service metrics for July – September 2025 for authorisations show 13 metrics in green, 1 in amber and none red.  It says the amber is because some cancellation applications exceeded the...

FSCS updates on compensation in 2025

The FSCS’ latest Outlook publication explains how the FSCS has now brought most of its claims management and all its customer call-handling in house, and as a result has halved the time it is taking to chase third...

FCA and MAS agree strategic partnership on AI

The FCA and the Monetary Authority of Singapore have agreed a new partnership on AI, which the regulators hope will enable innovative firms in the UK and Singapore to scale and operate effectively across markets, and...

Chancellor launches new Scale-Up unit

Speaking at an FCA Forum in Leeds, Rachel Reeves announced the launch of a new PRA/FCA “Scale-up unit” to support scaling firms to navigate regulation so they can grow and invest faster. The unit is...

Regulators agree remuneration reforms

The PRA and FCA have finalised rule changes following their consultations on changes to the remuneration rules for banks, building societies and designated investment firms. The aim of the changes, which met with...

Treasury repeals more EU laws

The latest Commencement Order made under FSMA 2023 brings into force the necessary powers to repeal various assimilated EU legislation on set dates, including: the MiFID Org Reg – with powers brought in from 23...

FCA to cut more reporting forms

The FCA has published its latest set of proposals for reducing the burden of regulatory reporting. It proposes to change the reporting frequency to annually  for sections E (PII), G (training and competence) and M...

FCA encourages boost to workplace savings

The FCA has taken action to help employers and savings providers offer workplace savings schemes in light of the Financial Lives Survey conclusion that around 30% o UK consumers have no, or less than £1000 in cash...

FCA publishes cyber resilience insights

The FCA has published some thoughts on good and poor practice arising from discussions with the Cyber Coordination Group during 2024. Key topics were: the reconnection framework and third party management: firms are...

FCA to consult on motor finance redress scheme

In the light of the Supreme Court judgment of 1 August, the FCA has confirmed it will consult on a redress scheme. It says it is clear that there have been breaches of the law and its rules where motor finance firms did...

FCA updates fee rate movement chart

The FCA has published a chart that clearly explains changes to fee rates for the 2025/6 fee year and the reasons for the change. The FCA’s annual funding requirement has increased by 3.8%. The chart explains why some...

PRA hosts Future Banking Data roundtable

The PRA has hosted a roundtable with CFOs at large systemic firms to discuss the Future Banking Data project, which focuses on opportunities to develop and implement a long-term reporting approach for firms which is...

FCA speaks on harnessing AI and technology

Jessica Rusu has spoken on how the FCA plans to harness AI and tech to deliver its strategic priorities. It says that proper use can help it deliver on all 4 pillars, including helping firms to get new customers and...

FCA finalises 2025/6 fees

The FCA has finalised its fees and levies for 2025/26. Changes include: FCA’s introduction of a new CC$ category for motor vehicle lending with discretionary commission arrangements for firms that entered into at...

PRA publishes 2025/26 fees

The PRA has published details of its fees for 2025/26.
The Total Funding Requirement (TFR) will be �350.2m, 0.8% lower than the 2024/25 TFR of �353m.
The Annual Funding Requirement (AFR) for 2025/26 is �336.4m, up �5.1m from 2024/25 AFR of �331.3 million, and �7.7m higher than that proposed due to the PRA receiving an increased allocation of the BoE�s wider investment portfolio and central support costs, partially offset by a decrease in the pensions provision.

FCA to “improve” Handbook website

The FCA plans to launch a newlook Handbook website, which it says will be easier to navigate than the current version. Other features will include the ability to compare different versions of the text so it is easier to...

Employment cases update – May 2025

Our case law update this month includes the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers, which clarified the interpretation of “man”, “woman” and “sex” for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010.� In Sullivan v Isle of Wight Council, the Court of Appeal looked at whether job applicants could claim whistleblowing protections.� Gourlay v West Dunbartonshire Council dealt with the reduction of compensation in the context of an unfair dismissal, victimisation and disability discrimination claim and in Madu v Loughborough College, the issue was the correct level of a costs order�made against a claimant.
For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers
A Scottish women’s rights group appealed against a decision that upheld the dismissal of its petition for judicial review of statutory guidance implemented under the Gender Representation on Public Boards (Scotland) Act 2018. The guidance stated that “woman” in that Act had the meaning under the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010) and that in the Gender Recognition Act 2004 (GRA 2004), where a full gender recognition certificate (GRC) had been issued to a person that their acquired gender was female or male, the person’s sex was that of a woman or a man respectively. The group argued that the 2018 Act purported to legislate on matters outside of the Scottish Parliament’s devolved competence.
The Supreme Court (SC) concluded that the terms “man”, “woman” and “sex” in the EqA 2010 refer to a person’s biological sex. �Although Section 9(1) GRA 2004 provides that a trans person with a GRC is entitled to have their acquired gender recognised for all purposes, Section 9(3) provides that this is subject to provision made by any other enactment or any subordinate legislation.� The SC held that the EqA 2010 is inconsistent with Section 9(1) and so Section 9(3) applied.� The SC emphasised that this interpretation does not remove protection from trans people, with or without a GRC. Trans people are protected from discrimination on the ground of gender reassignment and are also able to claim direct discrimination, indirect discrimination and harassment on the ground of perception or association with their acquired gender.
Sullivan v Isle of Wight Council [2025] EWCA Civ 379
Miss Sullivan had unsuccessfully applied for posts with the council. �She complained to the council and also later wrote to her MP detailing things that she said had occurred at the interviews and complaining about the activities of a charitable trust (of which one of the trustees was a member of the interviewing panel). �The council found her complaint to be unsubstantiated and did not offer her a further review. �Miss Sullivan subsequently brought a whistleblowing claim against the council, alleging that she had suffered a detriment as a result of the protected disclosure she had made about its employee’s alleged involvement in a trust with financial irregularities. �She accepted that she was not a worker within the meaning of the Employment Rights Act 1996 or an applicant for a post with an NHS employer, which would ordinally mean that she was not entitled to whistleblowing protection. �However, she argued that the legislation was incompatible with Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights, in so far as it protected workers and applicants for NHS posts but not job applicants generally.
The Court of Appeal held that being a job applicant is capable of constituting some “other status” under Article 14 but that an external job applicant is not in a ‘materially analogous’ position to internal applicants or applicants for NHS posts (who are protected by law).� Any difference in treatment is objectively justified because the legislation pursues a legitimate aim and the means adopted to achieve it are appropriate and proportionate.� Miss Sullivan had also not suffered any difference in treatment as a job applicant because her complaint to the council had been made as a member of the public and was not connected with possible employment.
Mr Brian Gourlay v West Dunbartonshire Council [2025] EAT 29
Mr Gourlay had multiple sclerosis and diabetes. �He was dismissed in 2015 for gross misconduct and brought claims for unfair dismissal, victimisation and disability discrimination. �It was agreed by the parties that he had developed a psychiatric illness by the date of his dismissal. �Mr Gourlay argued that his psychiatric illness was caused by the employer’s discrimination, and the employment tribunal (ET) accepted evidence that the employer’s failure to make reasonable adjustments had precipitated his illness and that he was permanently unfit for work. �The ET reduced Mr Gourlay’s past and future wage and pension loss to reflect the possibility that he would have sought or obtained ill health retirement on grounds unrelated to his psychiatric illness or that his employment would have terminated in 2017 in any event by a mutually agreed termination or by an irretrievable breakdown in working relationships.
Mr Gourlay appealed. �The Employment Appeal Tribunal�held that the ET was wrong to reduce his discrimination compensation, as the discriminatory dismissal had caused his permanent incapacity for work and the purpose of compensation was to put the employee in the position he would have been in had the discrimination not taken place. �A finding that his employment might have later ended lawfully if the dismissal had not occurred was based on speculation and did not justify a reduction in his compensation. �A reduction would only be appropriate if a lawful dismissal would also have caused him to be unable to work. �The case was remitted to a fresh ET to re-assess compensation.
Mr A E Madu v Loughborough College [2025] EAT 52
Mr Madu brought a claim for race discrimination against the college after failing to secure a part-time lecturer�role. �He was initially a litigant in person and then obtained legal representation.� His claim failed and the college applied for costs. �The ET concluded that Mr Madu should have appreciated from the outset that his claim had no reasonable prospects of success and awarded �20,000 in costs against him. He appealed and the EAT overturned the costs order. The ET had made assumptions about what advice Mr Madu had received from his solicitor, which was protected by legal professional privilege. �It was therefore wrong to infer that he must have been advised to discontinue his claim. �The ET had also failed to consider the difficulties claimants face in assessing the prospects of success in discrimination claims before the hearing, particularly when they act in person. �The claim was remitted to a fresh ET for reconsideration.

FCA to launch Supercharged AI sandbox

The FCA is launching a new, “supercharged” sandbox to give firms greater opportunity to experiment with AI. Its initiative that uses NVIDIA accelerated computing and enterprise software is open to all firms...

FOS consults on interest levels on compensation payments

The FOS is consulting on how it should be calculating the interest it orders firms to pay on compensation awards. It has been criticised for its current stance, which is to order businesses to pay 8% interest on top of any compensation for issues that have resulted in customers being deprived of money (pre-determination interest), or where they don’t pay the compensation on time (post-determination interest).
Feedback to the call for input on modernising the dispute resolution system generally has suggested it could be better if the interest rate were aligned with market conditions. So the FOS is now recommending changing the rate to the BoE base rate +1% for all new complaints, with the base rate calculated as an average rate over the period that the money way due until the date the redress payment is made.
The proposals will apply to pre-determination interest – the FOS gives an example of if an insurer undervalued the write off value of a car by �1,000, then the interest would be awarded from the date the complainant should have got that amount until the date they receive it, and to post-determination interest. But changing the approach to any interest that may be payable as part of a money award is not covered as these calculations have as their aim to ensure the complainant recovers their actual loss.
While the “tracker at average rate +1%” is the FOS’s preferred option, it also seeks views on whether it should

keep the current fixed rate
move to a lower fixed rate or
track base rate +1% but use the prevailing base rate at the time the complaint is determined.

It also seeks views on how to manage the transition to the new calculation. While its preferred option is to apply it to complaints it receives after the date it implements the new rate, the other options are:

apply to all existing cases as at the date of implementation
apply only where the act or omission complained about is after the implementation date or
apply only to customer losses that occur after the implementation date.

It also welcomes views on any challenges firms will face making the changes, when it might be appropriate not to apply interest and how often the FOS should review its approach to interest.
Consultation closes on 2 July.
 

FCA speaks on UK-China partnership

Ashley Alder has spoken of his optimism that financial cooperation between the UK and China is on the rise following the success of January’s UK-China Economic and Financial Dialogue. He highlighted the UK’s...

BoE speaks on digitalisation

Sarah Breedon has spoken on the importance of interoperability in an increasingly digitalised environment. She said the BoE is aware that developments in digital money and assets risk new systems emerging in what she...

FOS publishes half yearly complaints data

The FOS has published its complaints data for the period July to December 2024. Key statistics include: an increase of nearly 50% in new complaints compared to the same period in 2023 (141,000 new complaints) –...

FCA updates complaints stats

The FCA has updated its complaints data for H2 2024. Based on aggregate data; there was a slight decrease in complaints from H1; overall, complaints numbers have been relatively steady for the past 4 years; all products...

FCA publishes AI sprint summary

The FCA has published a summary of the AI sprint it held in January, which had 115 participants. 4 common themes came out of the event: that firms need clarity from the FCA on how regulatory frameworks apply to AI; the...

UK Finance feeds back on use of AI

UK Finance has responded to the Treasury Committee call for evidence on use of AI in financial services.  The response highlights: that adoption of AI varies significantly across financial services, but most...

FCA updates Regulatory Initiatives Grid

The updated Regulatory Initiatives Grid highlights many initiatives for various regulators relevant to the financial markets, including: during 2025: further action plan on FCA requirements in light of Consumer Duty...

PRA publishes Business Plan

The PRA’s 2025/6 Business Plan focuses on: significant work already completed on competitiveness and growth – such as the capital requirements to support SME and infrastructure lending, making the Solvency...

FPC looks at role and risks of AI

As part of its “Financial Stability in Focus” work, the FPC has published a paper looking at how the rapid pace of development in firms’ use of AI can cause uncertainties and how these may translate...

FCA publishes work programme 2025-6

The FCA has published its work programme for 2025-26, which builds on the 4 priority areas in its 5 year plan. Specific initiatives additional to those set out in the 5 year plan (which we summarised in this article)...

FOS sets out 2025/26 plans and budget

The FOS has published its plans and budget for 2025/26.
It expects to resolve 270,000 this financial year, a 20% increase compared to last year. To ensure fairness and value for money, it has maintained case fees for businesses at �650, and introduced a new fee model for professional representatives.
The ambitious case resolution target comes despite a considerable increase in complaints, particularly in relation to motor finance commission, which account for almost half of the FOS’s current 190,000 cases.
During the consultation stage, the FOS expected that it would receive around 240,000 cases in 2025/26. It now expects this figure to be closer to 209,000. This remains a slight increase compared to 2022/23 and 2023/24, but is a significant drop from the 330,000 cases the FOS predicts it will have received over 2024/25 as a result of motor finance commission complaints.
The FOS will publish full complaints data for 2024/25 during the summer.

PRA publishes regulatory digest

The PRA has published its regulatory digest, summarising important developments delivered in March 2025. Key publications included: Confirmation of the FSCS management expenses levy limit for 2025/26; Proposals to...

FCA gives more detail on rule streamlining

Alongside its action plan, the FCA has published details of its “Consumer Duty rule review“.  It has released a feedback statement following its call for input last year when it asked firms to tell it how...

FCA publishes 5 year strategy

The FCA has launched its much-trailed 5 year strategy. It will focus on 4 priorities: being a smarter regulator; supporting sustained economic growth; helping consumers to navigate their financial lives; and fighting...